Outcome of respiratory syncytial virus infection and a cost-benefit analysis of prophylaxis

Authors
Citation
A. Numa, Outcome of respiratory syncytial virus infection and a cost-benefit analysis of prophylaxis, J PAEDIAT C, 36(5), 2000, pp. 422-427
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH
ISSN journal
10344810 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
422 - 427
Database
ISI
SICI code
1034-4810(200010)36:5<422:OORSVI>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Objectives: To determine outcome and length of stay (LOS) for infants young er than 2 years of age admitted to hospital for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection and to perform a cost-benefit analysis of prophylaxis with RSV gamma-globulin (Respigam; CSL Laboratories, Melbourne, Victoria, Austr alia) and monoclonal antibody (Synagis; Abbott Australasia, Kurnell, NSW, A ustralia) in the Australian context. Methods: Retrospective outcome study using data from an Australian hospital and intensive care databases over a 30 month period encompassing three RSV seasons (1 May 1997-31 October 1999). Results: The mortality for RSV infection was very low, being 0.29% of all p atients admitted to hospital and 0% in infants without co-existing disease. Only 11.4% of infants required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Respiratory syncytial virus infection was not associated with prolonged ho spitalization; patients managed in the general wards had a mean length of s tay (LOS) of 4.13 days with a median of 3.0 days, while those requiring int ensive care had a mean LOS of 9.8 days (including 5.1 days in the ICU). Use of RSV prophylaxis would be expected to reduce the requirement for hospita l admission; however, the cost of prophylaxis is conservatively estimated t o be between 7.2- and 65.3-fold the money saved in hospital care, depending on the weight of the patient and choice of drug. Conclusions: Respiratory syncytial virus is a major cause of morbidity, but not mortality, in infants. In infants requiring hospitalization for this d isease, the LOS is relatively short and the mortality extremely low Use of prophylactic agents, which reduce the probability of hospital admission but have no effect on mortality, cannot be justified in the Australian context on cost-benefit grounds.