OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of ovarian cancel among women who use low-
estrogen-dose oral contraceptives.
STUDY DESIGN: The stimy used data on white women under 70 years of age who
had been enrolled in a population-based case-control study conducted betwee
n 1986 and 1988 in three western Washington counties. Women with ovarian ca
ncer (n = 276) were ascertained through a population-based cancer registry,
and controls (n = 391) were selected by random digit dialing. Unconditiona
l logistic regression mns used to estimate the risk of ovarian cancer assoc
iated with oral contraceptive use.
RESULTS: After adjustment for age and parity, women who took oral contracep
tives for at least three months were at decreased risk of ovarian cancer (o
dds ratio [OR] 0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-1.1) relative to women
who never used this form of contraception. The reduced risk of ovarian can
cer was present among women whose only preparation contained a low (< 50 mu
g ethinyl estradiol or <80 mu g mestranol) (OX 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.1) find h
igh (OX 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.2) estrogen nose.
CONCLUSION: While our results are limited in their statistical precision an
d by the inability of many subjects to recall the brands of oral contracept
ives that they took, they suggest that the neu)er, low-estrogen-nose oral c
ontraceptives confer a benefit regarding ovarian cancer risk similar to tha
t conferred by earlier, high-estrogen-dose formulations.