The purpose of the study reported here was to analyse the ways in which unv
ersity entrant science students carry out and communicate experimental acti
vities and to identify a model to explain characteristic communication prac
tices. The study was prompted by a need to inform the development of an int
roductory laboratory course. The students studied shared an educational bac
kground characterised by a lack of experience with laboratory work and scie
ntific writing. Seven groups of three students were studied. The investigat
ive strategies of these groups were observed. Laboratory reports were used
to identify the ways in which students communicated these strategies. Data
are presented that show a discrepancy between the strategies used and those
reported. The results suggest that: (i) students' perceptions of the purpo
se of a laboratory task influence their decisions on what to report; (ii) u
nderstandings of laboratory procedures greatly influence their decision on
what to report and on how much detail to include in a report and; (iii) kno
wledge of discourse rules contributes to effective reporting. It is conclud
ed that students' communication of an investigation results from the differ
ential operation of various perceptual filters that determine both the proc
edural and discourse elements of their reports. It is recommended that the
communication of science should be taught explicitly and alongside the proc
edures and concepts of science. (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.