A. De Lorenzo et al., Body composition measurement in highly trained male athletes - A comparison of three methods, J SPORT MED, 40(2), 2000, pp. 178-183
Background. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the difference
s in the body composition estimate of highly trained male athletes by three
different methods: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), bioelectrical i
mpedance analysis (BW) and skinfold thickness measurement (SFT).
Methods. The study occurred during a non-intensive training period. The mea
surements were performed at the Human Physiology laboratory, Participants:
forty-three male athletes (19 waterpolo, 9 judo, 15 karate) who exercised r
egularly at least three hours per day, six days per week. Measurements: DXA
, BLS. and SFT measurements of percentage fat mass (%FM) and the amount of
fat-free mass (FFM) were performed. Statistical analyses: the different %FM
estimates by the three methods were compared using a one-may ANOVA, with p
osthoc Bonferroni test when values mere significantly different. The same t
est was used to compare FFM values, The coefficient of variation (CV%=100xS
D/mean) was calculated for each methods, Methodological differences among t
he various methods were analysed with the method of Bland-Altman.
Results. ANOVA test showed significant differences among the three methods,
Ln particular, DXA significantly (p<0.001) over-estimated %FM(12.4+/-4.1%)
and underestimate FFM (67.0+/-6.9 kg) respect to SFT (7.8+/-0.9% and 71.0/-8.2 kg) and BW (9.9+/-1.4% and 69.4+/-7.9 kg), Also Bland-Altman comparis
on among the estimates indicated nide differences between methods.
Conclusions. DSA provides different body composition estimates than those d
erived from skinfold thickness measurement and BIA, so that the methods sho
uld not be used interchangeably.