Results of a total aortic arch replacement for an acute aortic arch dissection

Citation
T. Hirotani et al., Results of a total aortic arch replacement for an acute aortic arch dissection, J THOR SURG, 120(4), 2000, pp. 686-691
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
00225223 → ACNP
Volume
120
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
686 - 691
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5223(200010)120:4<686:ROATAA>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Objectives: Recently, the immediate results of a surgical repair for an acu te aortic arch dissection have dramatically improved. However, a total aort ic arch replacement is recommended in a limited number of patients with an intimal tear located in the aortic arch. We have performed a total aortic a rch replacement for all such patients with an acute aortic arch dissection since September 1995. Methods: During the past 4 years, 27 consecutive patients who had an aortic arch dissection underwent a total aortic arch replacement. Twenty-five pat ients underwent an emergency operation. In 5 patients the intimal tear was located in the aortic arch, but in the rest of the patients, it was located in the ascending aorta or the proximal descending aorta. To obliterate any false channels, gelatin-resorcin-formol glue was used. Results: The hospital mortality was 11%, and no cerebral complications were observed. Postoperative aortography and computed tomography showed no evid ence of any persisting false channels in 15 patients (65%). During the foll ow-up period (ranging from 5 months to 4 years), two patients underwent a r eoperation because of the recurrence of a dissection at the sinus of Valsal va. All patients, except for one who died after a reoperation, are still al ive and free from any serious events at this writing. Conclusions: Resecting both the ascending and transverse aorta, irrespectiv e of whether the intimal tear is located in the aortic arch, may be an acce ptable alternative at experienced centers because of its low mortality and good midterm results.