Some Korean-Japanese comparisons involving Japanese coronals complicate the
internal reconstruction of pre-Old Japanese. Post-OJ verb forms that end u
niformly in, for example, ki have distinct OJ final syllables (ki not equal
kwi) according to the form or paradigm of the verb. This is not true for O
J syllables like ii, but scholars have assumed that pre-OJ *ti not equal *t
wi, etc., were distributed in corresponding verb forms in the same way as O
J ki not equal kwi, etc. Whitman, however, has introduced K-J etymologies r
equiring that pre-OJ *ti > si, *ri and *ni > i, and hence that ALL OJ ti <
*twi, etc. These conflicting results can be resolved if other pre-OJ sound
changes supported by Korean etymologies are properly integrated into the in
ternal reconstruction of Japanese verb paradigms.