Kk. Li et al., Maxillomandibular advancement for persistent obstructive sleep apnea afterphase I surgery in patients without maxillomandibular deficiency, LARYNGOSCOP, 110(10), 2000, pp. 1684-1688
Objective: To assess the outcomes of maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) fo
r the treatment of persistent obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) after
phase I reconstruction in patients who do not have maxillomandibular defici
ency. Methods: From January 1997 to September 1998, 25 patients previously
treated with phase I reconstruction (uvulopalatoplasty, genioglossus advanc
ement, anchor hyoid suspension) who did not hac-e maxillary and mandibular
deficiencies underwent MMA for persistent OSA. Variables examined include a
ge, sex, body mass index (BMI), respiratory disturbance index (RDI), lowest
oxygen saturation (LSAT), and cephalometric data. In addition, a minimum o
f 6 months after surgery, questionnaires containing a 10-cm visual analogue
scale (0 = no change, 10 = drastic change) were mailed to the patients, Th
e questionnaire subjectively assessed the patient's perception of the facia
l appearance after surgery, whether there was pain or discomfort of the tem
poromandibular joint, the overall satisfaction with the treatment outcomes,
and whether the patient would recommend the operation to other patients. R
esults: Nineteen (76%) questionnaires were completed and returned by 15 men
and 4 women, The mean age was 45.3 +/- 6.6 years and the mean BMI was 33.1
+/- 7.1 kg/m(2). The mean RDI improved from 63.6 +/- 20.8 to 8.1 +/- 5.9 e
vents per hour, and the mean LSAT improved from 73.3 +/- 13.2% to 88.1 +/-
4.1% One patient was de fined as an incomplete responder (RDI >20), One pat
ient reported transient pain and discomfort of the temporomandibular joint.
Although all of the patients felt that there were changes in their facial
appearance after surgery, 18 of the 19 patients gave either a neutral or a
favorable response to their facial esthetic results. All of these patients
were satisfied with the overall outcomes and would recommend the treatment
to others. Conclusion: MMA is a highly effect ive treatment for persistent
OSA after phase I surgery in patients who otherwise do not have maxillomand
ibular deficiency. The patient satisfaction is extremely high. Furthermore,
previous concerns of unfavorable postoperative facial esthetics and tempor
omandibular joint dysfunction do not appear to be significant.