Theorists of Critical Legal Studies (CLS) have argued that the abstract, in
dividualistic, and state-dependent character of rights makes them of dubiou
s value for groups fighting for social change. Southern civil rights organi
zers in the early 1960s engaged in the kind of power-oriented strategy that
CLS writers advocate in lieu of a rights-oriented one. However, the rights
claims they made inside and outside courtrooms were essential to their pol
itical organizing efforts. Far from narrowing collective aspirations to the
limits of the law, activists' extension of rights claims to the "unqualifi
ed" legitimated assaults on economic inequality, governmental decisionmakin
g in poverty programs, and the Vietnam War. What made possible this novel f
ormulation was not only the multivalent character of rights but also key fe
atures of the social, political, and organizational contexts within which r
ights were advanced.