Test-retest reproducibility of the exercise treadmill examination in lumbar spinal stenosis

Citation
Hg. Deen et al., Test-retest reproducibility of the exercise treadmill examination in lumbar spinal stenosis, MAYO CLIN P, 75(10), 2000, pp. 1002-1007
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
ISSN journal
00256196 → ACNP
Volume
75
Issue
10
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1002 - 1007
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-6196(200010)75:10<1002:TROTET>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Objective: To provide further validation of the treadmill test by assessing its "test-retest" reproducibility, Patients and Methods: In this prospective study, 28 patients with severe lu mbar spinal stenosis underwent exercise treadmill testing, first at a walki ng speed of 1.2 mph and then at the patient's preferred walking speed, All patients had a second treadmill examination or "retest," No treatment inter vention was performed between the initial test and the retest. Time to firs t symptoms (TFS) and total ambulation time (TAT) were measured, Differences between the baseline examination and the retest examination were assessed by using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) as well as graphical ly, Results: There was good reproducibility between baseline test and retest re sults for all 4 end points: 1.2 mph, TFS (CCC = 0.90); 1.2 mph, TAT (CCC = 0.89); preferred walking speed, TFS (CCC = 0.98); and preferred walking spe ed, TAT (CCC = 0.96), The median difference between trials was not signific antly different from zero for any of the 4 outcomes, Conclusions: Exercise treadmill testing has good test-retest reproducibilit y, There was no learning phenomenon associated with the test procedure. The study further validates the clinical utility of exercise treadmill testing in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication.