Objective: To provide further validation of the treadmill test by assessing
its "test-retest" reproducibility,
Patients and Methods: In this prospective study, 28 patients with severe lu
mbar spinal stenosis underwent exercise treadmill testing, first at a walki
ng speed of 1.2 mph and then at the patient's preferred walking speed, All
patients had a second treadmill examination or "retest," No treatment inter
vention was performed between the initial test and the retest. Time to firs
t symptoms (TFS) and total ambulation time (TAT) were measured, Differences
between the baseline examination and the retest examination were assessed
by using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) as well as graphical
ly,
Results: There was good reproducibility between baseline test and retest re
sults for all 4 end points: 1.2 mph, TFS (CCC = 0.90); 1.2 mph, TAT (CCC =
0.89); preferred walking speed, TFS (CCC = 0.98); and preferred walking spe
ed, TAT (CCC = 0.96), The median difference between trials was not signific
antly different from zero for any of the 4 outcomes,
Conclusions: Exercise treadmill testing has good test-retest reproducibilit
y, There was no learning phenomenon associated with the test procedure. The
study further validates the clinical utility of exercise treadmill testing
in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication.