Objective: To analyze the significance of the Goltz-Ferrier debates held at
the International Medical Congress of 1881 for the development of ideas on
cerebral localization. Background: Cerebral localization was the subject o
f vigorous debate throughout the 19th century. At the Congress of 1881, Dav
id Ferrier, a leading proponent of cerebral localization, and Friedrich Leo
pold Goltz, an equally prominent anti-localizationist, had the opportunity
to present their experimental research before 3,000 of the world's leading
medical figures. Methods: The authors reviewed and translated the presentat
ions by Goltz and Ferrier at the Congress and supporting publications in co
ntemporary medical journals. Results: In his presentation to the Physiology
Section, Goltz criticized localizationists for their widely divergent conc
lusions about the exact anatomic sites of cortical centers and for their fa
ilure to adequately explain functional restitution after cortical ablations
. He noted that localizationist theories could, like an apple, "look very t
empting and still have a worm inside." He described his own studies on mass
ive decerebrations in dogs and noted that despite complete destruction of t
he cortices of both hemispheres these animals failed to exhibit motor weakn
ess or deficits in primary sensation. Ferrier noted that Goltz's results we
re irreconcilable with his own experiments in monkeys, in which circumscrib
ed lesions produced clear and reproducible functional deficits. Both invest
igators exhibited animals with cortical ablations. Ferrier's presentation o
f a hemiplegic monkey prompted Charcot's famous utterance, "C'est un malade
!" ["It's a patient!"]. A distinguished committee examined the brains of th
e animals, and confirmed that Ferrier had indeed succeeded in producing a c
ircumscribed lesion in the frontoparietal cortex, whereas the cortical abla
tions in Goltz's dogs were much less widespread than anticipated. Conclusio
ns: Ferrier's dramatic demonstration of the effects produced by localized l
esions in macaques triumphed over Goltz's unitary view of brain function, p
roviding a major impetus for the subsequent successful development of neuro
logic surgery.