MEGESTROL-ACETATE AND AMINOGLUTETHIMIDE HYDROCORTISONE IN SEQUENCE ORIN COMBINATION AS 2ND-LINE ENDOCRINE THERAPY OF ESTROGEN RECEPTOR-POSITIVE METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER - A SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP PHASE-III TRIAL/
Ca. Russell et al., MEGESTROL-ACETATE AND AMINOGLUTETHIMIDE HYDROCORTISONE IN SEQUENCE ORIN COMBINATION AS 2ND-LINE ENDOCRINE THERAPY OF ESTROGEN RECEPTOR-POSITIVE METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER - A SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP PHASE-III TRIAL/, Journal of clinical oncology, 15(7), 1997, pp. 2494-2501
Purpose: A phase III randomized trial was performed to determine wheth
er combination hormonal therapy with aminoglutethimide (AG) and hydroc
ortisone (HC) plus megestrol acetate (MA) improved response rates, res
ponse duration, or increased survival over the sequential use of each
hormone in women with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast can
cer (MBC) who had maintained stable disease for at least 6 months or r
esponded to tamoxifen. Patients and Methods: Two hundred eighty-eight
postmenopausal women with progressive estrogen receptor-positive MBC w
ere randomly selected to receive MA 40 mg four times daily (arm I), AG
250 mg four times daily with HC 40 mg daily in divided doses (arm II)
, versus the combination of MA plus AG given at the same dosages (arm
III). Patients on arms I and II who progressed after an adequate trial
were crossed over to the other treatment arm. Results: Two hundred th
irty-five eligible patients were evaluated for response, time to treat
ment failure, and survival. Response was only reported for patients wi
th measurable disease and was not statistically different among the th
ree arms, There were two partial responses (PRs) on MA (6%), four comp
lete responses (CRs) and six PRs on AG (24%), and eight PRs and three
CRs on MA plus AG (23%) in 32, 42, and 48 measurable patients, respect
ively. Median times to treatment failure were also similar at 5, 4, an
d 7 months. Survival was also not statistically different among the th
ree arms at 26, 27, and 26 months for arms I, II, and III, respectivel
y, Toxicity was greater in the two AG arms with respect to fatigue, na
usea and vomiting, and rash. Conclusion: With the exception of toxicit
y, there is no response, time to treatment failure, or survival benefi
t for any one group when comparing MA, AG, or the combination at their
stated doses in women with estrogen receptor-positive MBC who had pre
viously responded to or stabilized with tamoxifen. (C) 1997 by America
n Society of Clinical Oncology.