ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN OPERABLE BREAST-CANCER - CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, METHOTREXATE, AND FLUOROURACIL VERSUS CHLORAMBUCIL, METHOTREXATE, AND FLUOROURACIL-11-YEAR RESULTS OF SWISS-GROUP-FOR-CLINICAL-CANCER-RESEARCH TRIAL SAKK-27 82/
Hj. Senn et al., ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN OPERABLE BREAST-CANCER - CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, METHOTREXATE, AND FLUOROURACIL VERSUS CHLORAMBUCIL, METHOTREXATE, AND FLUOROURACIL-11-YEAR RESULTS OF SWISS-GROUP-FOR-CLINICAL-CANCER-RESEARCH TRIAL SAKK-27 82/, Journal of clinical oncology, 15(7), 1997, pp. 2502-2509
Purpose: To compare two adjuvant combination chemotherapies, cyclophos
phamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) and chlorambucil, methot
rexate, and fluorouracil (LMF), for patients who had undergone potenti
ally curative surgery for unilateral breast cancer, in terms of relaps
e, survival, and toxicity. Patients and Methods: Selection criteria wa
s as follows: stage pT1-3a, N+ or N-, M0, less than 72 years of age, E
ligible patients were randomized to receive either CMF (cyclophosphami
de 100 mg/m(2) orally on days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) intrave
nously (IV) on days 1 and 8, fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) IV on days 1 and
8) or LMF (Leukeran [Wellcome A.G., Bern, Switzerland] 5 mg/m(2) oral
ly on days 1 to 14 with the same IV cytostatic drugs). Follow-up exami
nations were performed every 3 months during the first 3 years after m
astectomy, and every 6 months thereafter, Results: A total of 246 pati
ents were randomized, of whom 232 who were fully eligible and contribu
te to the analyses presented here, No statistically significant differ
ence in favor of adjuvant CMF over LMF emerges after a median follow-u
p duration of 11.2 years, for either overall survival (P = .15) or dis
ease free survival (P = .14). A consistent trend suggestive of a possi
ble relative benefit associated with CMF should be pointed out, Howeve
r, CMF presents a significantly worse toxicity profile as concerns hem
atologic parameters as well as alopecia, nausea, and vomiting, Conclus
ion: This prospective trial has not identified a statistically signifi
cant difference in disease-free survival or overall survival between t
he two adjuvant regimens LMF and CMF, Although a trend in favor of CMF
has been observed in premenopausal patients, this has to be weighted
against its definitely more pronounced toxicity profile. (C) 1997 by A
merican Society of Clinical Oncology.