RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CVPP FOR 3-CYCLES VERSUS 6-CYCLES IN FAVORABLE-PROGNOSIS AND CVPP VERSUS AOPE PLUS RADIOTHERAPY IN INTERMEDIATE-PROGNOSIS UNTREATED HODGKINS-DISEASE
S. Pavlovsky et al., RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF CVPP FOR 3-CYCLES VERSUS 6-CYCLES IN FAVORABLE-PROGNOSIS AND CVPP VERSUS AOPE PLUS RADIOTHERAPY IN INTERMEDIATE-PROGNOSIS UNTREATED HODGKINS-DISEASE, Journal of clinical oncology, 15(7), 1997, pp. 2652-2658
Purpose: To evaluate in a randomized trial the impact versus six cycle
s of cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, procarbazine, and prednisone (CVPP
) chemotherapy in favorable-prognosis and CVPP versus doxorubicin, vin
cristine, prednisone, and etoposide (AOPE) plus involved-field radioth
erapy (RT) in intermediate-prognosis previously untreated Hodgkin's di
sease, Patients and Methods: Of 256 patients evaluated, 80 with a favo
rable prognosis according to a prognostic index designed by the Grupo
Argentina de Tratamiento de Leucemia Aguda (GATLA) were randomized to
three versus six cycles of CVPP without RT and 176 with intermediate r
isk to CVPP versus AOPE, both for six cycles with RT between the third
and fourth cycles of 30 Gy to the involved areas at diagnosis, CVPP c
onsisted of intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide and vinblastine on days
1 and 8, and oral procarbazine and prednisone on days 1 to 14, every 2
8 days. AOPE consisted of IV doxorubicin and vincristine on day 1, ora
l prednisone on days 1 to 5, and IV etoposide on days 1 and 3, every 2
8 days. Results: Complete remission was obtained in 39 of 41 (95%) pat
ients treated with three cycles of CVPP and 36 of 39 (92%) treated wit
h six cycles in the favorable-risk group (difference not significant [
NS]). In the intermediate-risk group, 89 of 92 (97%) treated with CVPP
plus RT versus 75 of 84 (89%) treated with AOPE plus RT achieved a co
mplete remission (P=.05). At 60 months, the event-free survival (EFS)
and overall survival rates in the favorable-risk group were 80% and 91
% for CVPP x 3 and 84% and 97% for CVPP x 6, respectively (P=NS). In t
he intermediate-risk group, 60-month EFS rate for CVPP plus RT was 85%
, compared with 66% for AOPE plus RT (P=.009). The overall survival ra
te was 95% versus 87% respectively (P=.157). Conclusion: Three cycles
of CVPP without RT ore equally effective as six cycles in the favorabl
e-risk group. However, in the intermediate-group, CVPP plus RT is supe
rior to AOPE plus RT, with significantly fewer events before and after
induction (P=.009), without a difference in overall survival. (C) 199
7 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.