Dc. Malone et al., An economic analysis of a randomized, controlled, multicenter study of clinical pharmacist interventions for high-risk veterans: The IMPROVE study, PHARMACOTHE, 20(10), 2000, pp. 1149-1158
Study Objective. To determine if clinical pharmacists could affect economic
resource use and humanistic outcomes in an ambulatory high-risk population
.
Design. Prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Setting. Nine Veterans Affairs medical centers.
Patients. Patients who were at high risk for medication-related problems.
Intervention. Patients were randomized to usual medical care with input fro
m a clinical pharmacist (intervention group) or just usual medical care (co
ntrol group).
Measurements and Main Results. Of 1054 patients enrolled, 523 were randomiz
ed to the intervention group and 531 to the control group. The number of cl
inic visits increased in the intervention group (p=0.003), but there was no
difference in clinic costs. Mean increases in total health care costs were
$1020 for the intervention group and $1313 for the control group (p=0.06).
Conclusion. including the cost of pharmacist interventions, overall health
care expenditures were similar for patients randomized to see a clinical ph
armacist versus usual medical care.