The past decade has seen a wealth of new data on the auditory capabilities
and mechanisms of fishes. We now Irate a significantly better. appreciation
of the structure and function of the auditory system in fishes with regard
to thier peripheral and central anatomy, physiology, behaviour, sound sour
ce localization and hearing capabilities. This paper deals with two of the
newest of these findings, hair cell heterogeneity and the detection of ultr
asound. As a result of this recent work, we now know that fishes have sever
al different types of sensory hair cells in both the ear and lateral line a
nd there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that these hair cell type
s arose very early in the evolution of the octavolateralis system. There is
also some evidence to suggest that the differences in the hair cell types
hate functional implications far tlc way the ear and lateral line of fishes
detect and process stimuli. Behaviour al studies have shown that, whereas
most fishes can only detect sound to 1-3 kHz, several species of the genus
Alosa (Clupeiformes, i.e. herrings and their relatives) can detect sounds u
p to 180 kHz (or even higher). It is suggested that this capability evolved
so that these fishes can detect one of their major predators, echolocating
dolphins. The mechanism for ultrasound detection remains obscure, though i
t is hypothesized that the highly derived utricle of the inner ear in these
species is involved.