K. Katz et al., Vasopressin presser effects in critically ill children during evaluation for brain death and organ recovery, RESUSCITAT, 47(1), 2000, pp. 33-40
Background: Vasopressin (VP) shows promise as a presser agent in animals an
d adult human cardiac arrest and resuscitation, but has not been studied fo
r presser effect in critically ill or arrested children. VP infusion is rou
tine treatment for diabetes insipidus during brain death evaluation and org
an recovery. We hypothesized that low dose VP infusion during organ recover
y in critically ill children exerts a presser effect, without major organ t
oxicity. Methods: 34 VP-treated and 29 age-matched critically ill controls(
C) less than or equal to 18 years were retrospectively reviewed during brai
n death evaluation and organ recovery. VP infusion protocol titrated VP dos
e clinically to urine output, with high variability. Presser and inotrope m
anagement was titrated clinically to BP, cerebral perfusion and central ven
ous pressures (when available) and peripheral perfusion with similar protoc
ol targets for pre-load in VP and C groups. Outcome measures include dose,
type and number of pressors and inotropes. Organ function was assessed at r
ecovery and 48 h post-transplant by independent surgeon and transplant prog
ram organ function criteria. Analysis by Odds Ratio (OR), and chi-square. R
esults: VP dose averaged 0.041 +/- 0.069 U/kg/h. Average baseline mean arte
rial pressure (MAP) before VP infusion was 79 +/- 17 mmHg VP and 76 +/- 14
mmHg C (P = 0.6). Subsequent average MAP were: 82 +/- 21 mmHgVP after VP in
fusion versus 71 +/- 16 mmHg C (P = 0.01) and 80 +/- 14 mmHg VP versus 68 /- 22 mmHg C (P = 0.01). Ability to wean/stop pressors and inotropes was: d
opamine (14/23) 42% VP versus (10/26) 38% C (P = 0.75), dobutamine (4/7) 57
% VP versus (0/6) 0% C (P = 0.026), epinephrine (4/5) 80% VP versus (0/6) 0
% C (P = 0.006), norepinephrine/phenylephrine (4/4) 100% VP versus (2/5) 40
% C (P = 0.057). Alpha agonist presser dependence was successfully weaned f
rom 7/9 (78%) VP versus 0/9 (0%) C: odds ratio = 7.3, (P < 0.01). There was
no VP induced dysrhythmia, hypertension, anuria or toxicity reported. Good
organ recovery function was not significantly different at recovery or 48
h post-transplant for kidney (79% VP versus 69% C, P = 0.068), liver (87% V
P versus 95% C, P = 0.533), or heart (90% VP versus 71% C, P = 0.11). Concl
usions; Low dose vasopressin infusion exerts a presser effect in critically
ill children treated for diabetes insipidus during brain death and organ r
ecovery. VP treated patients were 7.3 times more likely to wean from alpha
agonists than comparably managed age matched controls, without adverse affe
ct on transplant organ function. We speculate that further prospective asse
ssment of VP safety and efficacy as a presser adjunct for resuscitation of
critically ill children is warranted. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd
. All rights reserved.