Wh. Baker et al., Effect of contralateral occlusion on long-term efficacy of endarterectomy in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS), STROKE, 31(10), 2000, pp. 2330-2334
Background and Purpose-The Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS
) established the effectiveness of prophylactic carotid endarterectomy, for
patients in good health who had stenosis greater than or equal to 60%, if
conducted by surgeons with a surgical morbidity and mortality of <3%. This
secondary analysis was pet-formed to determine whether the presence of cont
ralateral cervical carotid occlusion alters the efficacy of asymptomatic ip
silateral carotid endarterectomy.
Methods-One hundred sixty-three participants who had a baseline contralater
al occlusion documented by Doppler ultrasound (77 medical, 86 surgical) wer
e compared with 1485 participants with a patent contrarateral carotid arter
y (748 medical, 737 surgical) for the risk of a combined end point of perio
perative (30-day) death or stroke or long-term (5-year) ipsilateral stroke.
Results-For those without contralateral occlusion, surgery was associated w
ith a 6.7% absolute reduction in the 5-year risk (95% CI, 2.1% to 11.4%), w
hile for those with a contralateral occlusion, surgery was associated with
a 2.0% absolute increase in risk (95% CI, -9.3% to 5.2%), which was a stati
stically significant difference in the effect of surgery (P=0.047). This di
fference is primarily attributable to low long-term risk for medically mana
ged patients with contralateral occlusion.
Conclusions-While this past hoc analysis should be interpreted with caution
, the findings suggest that endarterectomy in asymptomatic subjects with co
ntralateral occlusion provides no long-term benefit (and may be harmful) in
preventing stroke and death. These findings were a result of the beni,on c
ourse of medically treated subjects.