The influence of ovarian activity and uterine involution determined by ultrasonography on subsequent reproductive performance of dairy cows

Citation
Im. Sheldon et al., The influence of ovarian activity and uterine involution determined by ultrasonography on subsequent reproductive performance of dairy cows, THERIOGENOL, 54(3), 2000, pp. 409-419
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health","da verificare
Journal title
THERIOGENOLOGY
ISSN journal
0093691X → ACNP
Volume
54
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
409 - 419
Database
ISI
SICI code
0093-691X(200008)54:3<409:TIOOAA>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that a follicle >8 m m diameter in the ovary ipsilateral to the previously gravid uterine horn ( PGUH), between 14 and 28 days postpartum, improves subsequent reproductive performance. Lactating Holstein-Friesian cows (n = 284) in 3 commercial her ds were examined using transrectal ultrasonography once between 14 and 28 d ays postpartum to determine associations between uterine and ovarian measur ements and subsequent fertility. There were fewer cows with a corpus luteum in the ovary ipsilateral to the PGUH compared with the contralateral ovary (16.9% vs. 37.0%; P < 0.001). In addition, in the ovary ipsilateral to the PGUH there were fewer follicles >5 mm diameter (mean +/- SEM; 0.69 +/- 0.0 6 vs. 1.02 +/- 0.06; P < 0.001) and fewer animals with a follicle >8 mm dia meter (26.1% vs. 49.6%; P < 0.001). These differences between the ovaries i psilateral or contralateral to the PGUH declined with increasing time betwe en 14 and 28 days postpartum. The presence of a purulent vaginal discharge decreased the number of animals with a corpus luteum in the ovary contralat eral to the PGUH (45/143 vs. 60/141; P < 0.05), but not in the ovary ipsila teral to the PGUH. The presence of a follicle >8 mm diameter in the ovary i psilateral to the PGUH was associated with a shorter calving to conception interval compared with animals without such a follicle (99.0 +/- 5.6 days, n = 74, vs. 112.8 +/- 4.4 days, n = 210; P < 0.05). These observations rais e an intriguing issue: how does this follicle affect subsequent fertility - does the follicle exert a local influence on the uterus, or vice versa? (C ) 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc.