Sonographic visualization of normal-size ovaries during pregnancy

Citation
J. Shalev et al., Sonographic visualization of normal-size ovaries during pregnancy, ULTRASOUN O, 15(6), 2000, pp. 523-526
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
ISSN journal
09607692 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
523 - 526
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-7692(200006)15:6<523:SVONOD>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Objective To assess the ability, of ultrasound to detect ovaries of normal size during pregnancy Methods A prospective study, of 329 women with a normal pregnancy course wa s undertaken; 68 were excluded front analysis because of an enlarged cystic ovary. Of the remainder, 60 pregnancies were examined in the first trimest er and 201 in the second or third trimester. The first group underwent tran svaginal (TVS) and transabdomminal (TAS) scanning. The second group underwe nt TAS examination only. Results In the first-trimester group, TI'S identified both ovaries in 57 pa tients (95%) and transabdominal ultrasound in 20 (33.3%). In the second- an d third-trimester patients, TAS visualized both ovaries in 33 patients (16. 4%), and neither ovary in 120 (59.7%). Both ovaries were less risible with advancing gestational age. The right ovary showed a significant change in p osition during pregnancy, from about 1 cm (nt 15-24 weeks) to 2.5 cm (at 30 -41 weeks) cranial to the iliac spine. The left ovary was found 1 cm above the iliac spine throughout pregnancy. Conclusions Transvaginal sonography is adequate for the visualization of bo th ovaries in the first trimester of pregnancy? With advanced gestational a ge, the ovaries were significantly less visible by TAS. Sonographic scannin g of the ovaries ill second and third trimester should be concentrated main ly at the level of the iliac spine. Poor sonographic visualization of both ovaries in late gestation may mandate the use of other imaging modalities.