Acoustic evoked response following transection of the eighth nerve in the rat

Citation
Sk. Rosahl et al., Acoustic evoked response following transection of the eighth nerve in the rat, ACT NEUROCH, 142(9), 2000, pp. 1037-1045
Citations number
64
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
ISSN journal
00016268 → ACNP
Volume
142
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1037 - 1045
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-6268(2000)142:9<1037:AERFTO>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Object. The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is the most widely used means of intra-operative monitoring of the integrity of the auditory nerve and b rainstem pathways during surgery in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). Relia bility of this and other electrophysiological techniques has been questione d because of persisting potentials in direct nerve recordings despite compl ete eighth nerve section. The study was designed to assess the extent to which an acoustic evoked res ponse persists after the cochlear nerve is lesioned in the CPA of the adult rat. Methods. The eighth nerve was exposed microsurgically via a lateral subocci pital approach without damage to surrounding structures. The auditory brain stem response to monaurally presented click stimuli was recorded using need le electrodes and a bandpass of 10 to 5000 Hz. Findings. Complete sharp sectioning of the nerve in the CPA resulted in imm ediate disappearance of brainstem-generated potentials but persistence of a large primary, vertex-positive wave in all but one case. This response was also abolished in recordings three days later and after emptying the inner ear canal. Provided that the cochlea remained intact, two weeks later a si ngle, vertex-positive potential in the latency range of wave Ia of the ABR reappeared, reaching its peak amplitude six weeks after sectioning of the n erve. Conclusions. The short-latency electrical potential recorded following dama ge of the eighth nerve in the cerebellopontine angle can be mistaken for an indication that nerve function is still preserved. The evoked injury poten tial is probably the major contributor to this potential that resembles wav e I of the ABR. Monitoring of functional auditory integrity must neither be limited to early components of the ABR, nor to the electrocochleogram (Eco G) and the peripheral compound nerve action potential (CNAP), respectively.