J. Kolevska et M. Svoboda, Immunoreactive cortisol measurement in canine urine and its validity in hyperadrenocorticism diagnosis, ACT VET B, 69(3), 2000, pp. 217-223
The aim of this study was to compare two methods of immunoreactive cortisol
determination in urine and an assessment of the validity of urine cortisol
/creatinine ratio (UCCR) in dogs. The UCCR was measured in three groups of
dogs: (1) healthy dogs, (2) dogs with hyperadrenocorticism and (3) dogs suf
fering from other diseases presented with polyuria and polydipsia (PU/PD).
All cortisol measurements in urine were performed using two methods: (1) fl
uorescence polarisation immunoassay (FPIA) with urine extraction and (2) ra
dioimmunoassay (RIA) without urine extraction. Paired results of 30 cortiso
l measurements and 30 UCCR were compared using the Wilcoxon test. It was pr
oved that the differences between the two methods (i.e., FPIA with urine ex
traction and RIA without urine extraction) were highly statistically signif
icant (p < 0.01). While in the cortisol measurement using the FPIA with uri
ne extraction the median of the UCCR amounted to 18.53 x 10(-6), in the RIA
without urine extraction it was 37.83 x 10(-6). Values of the UCCR in indi
vidual canine groups were also compared with each other. The UCCR in dogs w
ith hyperadrenocorticism was higher (p < 0.01) than in healthy dogs or dogs
presented with the PU/PD signs. There were also found significant differen
ces (p < 0.05) between the UCCR in healthy dogs and dogs presented with PU/
PD signs. Both methods of immunoreactive cortisol determination in urine ca
n be used for clinical diagnosis of hyperadrenocorticism, however, the abov
e mentioned differences should be considered.