Mc. Gerling et al., Effects of cervical spine immobilization technique and laryngoscope blade selection on an unstable cervical spine in a cadaver model of intubation, ANN EMERG M, 36(4), 2000, pp. 293-300
Study objective: Orotracheal intubation (OTI) is commonly used to establish
a definitive airway in major trauma victims, with several different cervic
al spine immobilization techniques and laryngoscope blade types used. This
experimental, randomized, crossover trial evaluated the effects of manual i
n-line stabilization and cervical collar immobilization and 3 different lar
yngoscope blades on cervical spine movement during OTI in a cadaver model o
f cervical spine injury.
Methods: A complete C5-C6 transection was performed by using an osteotome o
n 14 fresh-frozen cadavers. OTI was performed in a randomized crossover fas
hion by using both immobilization techniques and each of 3 laryngoscope bla
des: the Miller straight blade, the Macintosh curved blade, and the Corazel
li-London-McCoy hinged blade. Intubations were recorded in real time on flu
oroscopy and then transferred to video and color still images. Outcome meas
ures included movement across C5-C6 with regard to angulation expressed in
degrees of rotation and axial distraction and anteroposterior displacement
with values expressed as a proportion of C5 body width. Cormack-Lehane Visu
alization grades were also recorded as a secondary outcome measure. Data we
re analyzed by using multivariate analysis of Variance to test for differen
ces between immobilization techniques and between laryngoscope blades and t
o detect for interactions. Significance was assumed for P values of less th
an .05.
Results: Manual in-line stabilization resulted in significantly less moveme
nt than cervical collar immobilization during OTI with regard to anteropost
erior displacement. Use of the Miller straight blade resulted in significan
tly less movement than each of the other 2 blades with regard to axial dist
raction. The Cormack-Lehane grade was significantly better with manual inli
ne stabilization versus cervical collar immobilization; no differences were
observed between blades.
Conclusion: Manual in-line stabilization results in less cervical subluxati
on and allows better vocal cord visualization during OTI in a cadaver model
of cervical spine injury. The Miller laryngoscope blade allowed less axial
distraction than the Macintosh or Corzelli-London-McCoy blades. The clinic
al significance of this degree,of movement is unclear.