A. Bergamo et al., Effects of NAMI-A and some related ruthenium complexes on cell viability after short exposure of tumor cells, ANTI-CANC D, 11(8), 2000, pp. 665-672
A series of three ruthenium complexes, i.e. trans-dichlorotetrakisdimethyl-
sulfoxide ruthenium(II) (trans-Ru), imidazolium trans-imidazoletetra-chloro
ruthenate (ICR) and sodium trans-tetramethylensulfoxideisoquinoline-tetrach
lororuthenate (TEQU), were studied in vitro in comparison to NAMI-A, a pote
nt ruthenium-based antimetastasis agent. In vitro challenge of TS/A adenoca
rcinoma or KB oral carcinoma tumor cells with 10(-4) M concentration for 1
h evidenced the lack of cytotoxicity of NAMI-A, ICR and trans-Ru, the accum
ulation of cells in the G(2)/M pre-mitotic cell phase by NAMI-A and the att
achment of tumor cells to the plastic substrate was significantly greater f
or NAMI-A than for ICR. These data stress that in vitro cytotoxicity is not
necessary for in vivo activity of ruthenium antitumor complexes: NAMI-A, I
CR and trans-Ru, are in fact known to be active against murine tumors in th
e mouse system. Rather, TEQU, the compound free of in vivo activity, was th
e only one to reduce cell growth of In vitro cultured cells. In conclusion,
the data on the effects of NAMI-A on in vitro cultured cells show that the
increase of cell adhesion properties and the transient cell cycle arrest i
n the G(2)/M phase are much more relevant than the effects on cell properti
es relevant to cell growth (i.e. on CD44, CD54 or CD71 antigens) for determ
ining in vivo antimetastasis activity. [(C) 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilk
ins.].