The "high-stakes" nature of the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS)
evolved from earlier implementations of assessments explicitly linked to th
e Texas curriculum. A major focus of the GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency
(1999) litigation challenged the assessment on this curricular link as wel
l as other "opportunity to learn" issues. In this article, we provide a chr
onological summary of the evolution of these assessments in Texas. This con
textual background facilitates understanding of the issues behind the litig
ation as we review the increasingly high-stakes nature of assessment in Tex
as from 1980 to present. Roles of the Texas State Legislature, the Texas St
ate Board of Education, and the Texas Education Agency are also explained.
The review provided in this article outlines how, as the assessments evolve
d, the procedures, process, and technical documentation expanded. These pro
cedures and documentation provided the evidence needed to successfully defe
nd the TAAS assessment program in federal court.