Defending a state graduation test: GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency. Measurement perspectives from an external evaluator

Authors
Citation
Wa. Mehrens, Defending a state graduation test: GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency. Measurement perspectives from an external evaluator, APPL MEAS E, 13(4), 2000, pp. 387-401
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Education
Journal title
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION
ISSN journal
08957347 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
387 - 401
Database
ISI
SICI code
0895-7347(2000)13:4<387:DASGTG>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
In this article, I present the perspectives of an independent measurement e xpert regarding the Texas state graduation test, the Texas Assessment of Ac ademic Skills (TAAS). I conclude, among other things, that (a) the TAAS was constructed according to acceptable professional standards; Co) it tests c urricular material that Texas Board of Education views important for gradua tes to have mastered; (c) students have had ample opportunity to learn the material tested on the TAAS; (d) providing instruction on the domain the te st samples seems commendable; (e) the TAAS requirement should increase effo rts to educate all students in Texas; (f) the TAAS is sufficiently reliable and valid; (g) conjunctive decision making is an appropriate decision maki ng model; and (h) the standard setting was done in a manner that met profes sional standards.