Computerized posturography analysis of progressive supranuclear palsy - A case-control comparison with Parkinson's disease and healthy controls

Citation
W. Ondo et al., Computerized posturography analysis of progressive supranuclear palsy - A case-control comparison with Parkinson's disease and healthy controls, ARCH NEUROL, 57(10), 2000, pp. 1464-1469
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
ISSN journal
00039942 → ACNP
Volume
57
Issue
10
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1464 - 1469
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9942(200010)57:10<1464:CPAOPS>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Background: Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a neurodegenerative dis order that is frequently mistaken for Parkinson's disease (PD) in its early stages. Objective: To compare balance measures using computerized posturography in patients with early PSP and early PD. Methods: We performed computerized posturography (SMART Balance Master, Neu roCom International, Inc, Clackamas, Ore) in 20 patients with clinically di agnosed mild to moderate PSP (ambulatory) and compared results with those f rom 20 patients with PD of similar age and disease duration who were not re ceiving medications, and from 20 healthy age- and sex-matched controls. Sen sory organization testing (SOT), limits of stability (LOS), and toes-up per turbations (4 degrees at 50 degrees per second) were tested while receiving and not receiving a combination of oral carbidopa (25 mg) and levodopa (25 0 mg) in the PSP group. Clinical assessment included Unified Parkinson's Di sease Raring Scale, Performance-oriented assessments, and functional reach. Results: When compared with the PD and control groups, total LOS time (P<.0 01) and path sway (P<.001) were significantly prolonged in PSP. Total SOT s howed significantly worse scores in PSP compared with PD and control groups (F-2.57=29.6; P<.001). Univariate follow-up tests comparing PSP and PD sho wed differences in the following conditions: eyes open and visual sway (P=. 003), eyes open and platform sway (P=.003), eyes closed and platform sway ( P<.001), and eyes open and platform and visual sway (P<.001). Medium- and l ong-latency responses to perturbation were similar, but a larger number in the PSP group lacked short-latency responses (chi(2)=11.3; P=.002). Levodop a administration did not significantly improve any aspect of posturography testing in PSP. In differentiating PSP from PD, LOS time and SOT condition of eyes open and platform and visual sway were nearly 100% sensitive and 10 0% specific (canonical correlation, 0.91). Conclusions: Computerized post urography testing reliably differentiated ea rly PSP from early PD and age-matched controls. The PSP group demonstrated severely contracted limits of stability with probable deficits in motor pro gramming. Results of SOT in PSP suggested a vestibular pattern and overreli ance on visual cues, even when incorrect. The absence of short-latency resp onses (monosynaptic reflex arch) suggests an additional disturbance in the spinal cord or peripheral nervous system.