Permanent tunneled silicone central venous catheters for autologous PBPC harvest in children and young adults

Citation
G. Fischmeister et al., Permanent tunneled silicone central venous catheters for autologous PBPC harvest in children and young adults, BONE MAR TR, 26(7), 2000, pp. 781-786
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
02683369 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
781 - 786
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-3369(200010)26:7<781:PTSCVC>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Children with high risk malignancies are usually given permanent (Hickman-t ype) tunneled silicone rubber central venous catheters (silicone CVCs) for the administration of chemotherapy, In the past, these children received an additional short-term polyurethane dialysis CVC for stem cell apheresis, T o avoid placement of an additional short-term CVC, we started in 1995 to us e pre-existing silicone CVCs for PBPC harvests. From May 1996 to February 1 999 we evaluated 165 harvests in 37 children and 14 young adults (16-28 yea rs) treated with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell support, comparing CD 34(+) cell harvest efficiency, catheter tolerability, and complications in three different approaches to vascular access. Pre-existing silicone CVCs ( 64%) or peripheral venous cannulae (15%) were the first choice for venous a ccess. Only when these failed were polyurethane CVCs (21%) used, No signifi cant difference was seen between these three groups, even after dividing th e silicone CVC group (105 harvests in 32 patients) into three subgroups acc ording to weight and age, The most frequent problems were citrate toxicity (n = 33), mechanical obstruction inside (n = 9) and outside the cell separa tor (n = 2), decreased draw line flow in silicone CVCs (n = 7), decreased d raw line flow in peripheral venous cannulae (n = 6), and one occlusion in a polyurethane CVC, Pre-existing CVCs and peripheral venous cannulae functio ned efficiently when used as a draw line in 79% of the apheresis procedures without significantly reducing single harvest efficiency or catheter toler ability. Consequently, the risks and costs associated with the placement of a dialysis CVC could be avoided in the majority of cases.