C. Stephen et Ae. Burger, A COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR SURVEYING MORTALITY OF BEACHED BIRDS INBRITISH-COLUMBIA, Canadian veterinary journal, 35(10), 1994, pp. 631-635
Systematic surveys of beached birds are often limited in their ability
to classify the causes of death of the carcasses recovered. Two metho
ds of determining the cause of death of seabirds encountered during su
rveys of beaches of southwestern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, a
re compared. Birds were either subjected to external visual examinatio
ns by volunteer beach surveyors or submitted for gross postmortem exam
ination by a verterinarian. The reliance on external examination of bi
rds on beaches often prevented the accurate classification of the repr
oductive status and cause of death of the birds collected, but was val
uable for describing the species, locations, and numbers of birds affe
cted. The use of gross postmortem examinations of carcasses allowed fo
r a more refined classification of the cause of death, as well as prov
iding reliable descriptions of the bodily condition and sex of the bir
ds examined. However, almost one half of the carcasses encountered wer
e unsuitable for necropsy because of scavenging and decomposition. It
is concluded that a combination of field and necropsy observations pro
vides a useful method with which to monitor the pattern of mortality o
f beached seabirds.