H. Finegold et al., Comparison of ropivacaine 0.1%-fentanyl and bupivacaine 0.125%-fentanyl infusions for epidural labour analgesia, CAN J ANAES, 47(8), 2000, pp. 740-745
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE
Purpose: To compare analgesic efficacies of ropivacaine-fentanyl and bupiva
caine-fentanyl infusions for labour epidural analgesia.
Methods: In this double-blind, randomized study 100, term, nulliparous wome
n were enrolled, Lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) was started at cervical di
latation < 5 cm using either bupivacaine 0.25% followed by bupivacaine 0.12
5% + 2 mu g.ml(-1) fentanyl infusion (n=50) or ropivacaine 0.2% followed by
ropivacaine 0,1% + 2 mu g.ml(-1) fentanyl infusion (n=50). Every hour mate
rnal vital signs, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, sensory levels, and
motor block (Bromage score) were assessed. Data were expressed as mean +/-
1 SD and analyzed using Chi-Squared and Mann-Whitney U tests at < 0.05,
Results: The onset times were 10.62 +/- 4.9 and 11.3 +/- 4.7 min for the bu
pivacaine and ropivacaine groups respectively (P = NS). The median VAS scor
es were not different between the groups at any of the evaluation periods.
However, at least 80% of patients in the ropivacaine group had no demonstra
ble motor block after the first hour compared with only 55% of patients giv
en bupivacaine (P = 0.01).
Conclusions: Both bupivacaine and ropivacaine produce satisfactory labour a
nalgesia. However, ropivacaine infusion is associated with less motor block
throughout the first stage of labour and at 10 cm dilatation.