Clinimetric scale to measure surgeons' satisfaction with anesthesia services

Citation
S. Le May et al., Clinimetric scale to measure surgeons' satisfaction with anesthesia services, CAN J ANAES, 47(5), 2000, pp. 398-405
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE
ISSN journal
0832610X → ACNP
Volume
47
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
398 - 405
Database
ISI
SICI code
0832-610X(200005)47:5<398:CSTMSS>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Purpose: Continuous quality improvement is of increasing interest to anesth esiologists. Since surgeons are coworkers and important clients of anesthes iologists, the level of satisfaction of surgeons with anesthesia services s hould be explored to optimize quality. The purpose of this study was, first , to introduce the concept of surgeons as clients of anesthesiologists and second, to develop and test an instrument to measure surgeons' satisfaction , the Surgeon Satisfaction with Anesthesia Services (SSAS) scale, Methods: A conceptual model of surgeon satisfaction with anesthesia service s was created before the development of the SSAS scale. The scale, composed of socio-demographic, Likert-type and open-ended questions was sent to a s ample of 250 surgeons selected randomly by the College des Medecins du Queb ec Exploratory factorial analysis were performed on the results. Results: A Cronbach's alpha of 0.84 was obtained for internal consistency. Exploratory factorial analysis yielded two subscale factors: a) clinical ex pertise and b) attitudes and behaviour. Global mean of surgeons' satisfacti on was moderately high (3.11/4.0). Satisfaction was not related to sociodem ographic variables. Very high scores were obtained for items related to cli nical expertise. Items related to attitudes and behaviour obtained lower sc ores. A significant difference was obtained between both factors (t = -5.73 2, P = 0.0001). Conclusion: The SSAS scale is a new instrument to evaluate surgeon satisfac tion, Overall, surgeons seem satisfied with anesthesia services, but many a reas of dissatisfaction persist. Further discussions with surgeons should b e encouraged, in view of improving the perceptions of the quality of anesth esia services and interprofessional relationships.