Mc. Vallejo et al., Improved bowel function after gynecological surgery with epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl than bupivacaine-morphine infusion, CAN J ANAES, 47(5), 2000, pp. 406-411
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE
Purpose: To compare postoperative gastrointestinal recovery between continu
ous epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-morphine.
Methods: In a blinded, randomized, prospective trial, 60 women undergoing s
urgery for gynecologic cancer were studied. Anesthesia was provided by a co
mbined general/epidural (L2-3 catheter) technique without epidural opioids:
Postoperative epidural analgesia was by continuous infusion of bupivacaine
0.1% with either morphine 0.05mg.ml(-1) (BM) or fentanyl 5 mu g.ml(-1) (BF
). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for pain at rest and during movement,
and the return of bowel function were collected for three days and the dur
ation of hospitalization were noted.
Results: On POD-1, 18.5% of patients in the BM group had emesis compared wi
th none in the BF group (P = 0.038) and fewer patients in the BM group tole
rated clear oral fluids (11.1% BM vs 40.6% BF, P = 0.025). These difference
s became insignificant on POD-2 and 3. Median pain scores were comparable a
t rest and ranged from 10-20 in the BM group vs 0-20 in the BF group over t
he three days, Similarly, median pain scores with movement respectively ran
ged from 20-25 and 20-30 in the BF and BM groups. The mean duration of hosp
italization was longer in the BM group (5.7 +/- 2.4) vs BF (4.5 +/- 1.2 day
s), P = 0.017.
Conclusion: Epidural BM and BF provided equally effective postoperative ana
lgesia at rest and during movement. Compared with BM, epidural BF is associ
ated with less emesis and an increased ability to tolerate oral fluids on P
OD-1 and an overall shorter hospital stay.