Ji. Redondo et al., Propofol or thiopentone as induction agents in romifidine-sedated and halothane-N2O-anesthetized dogs: a preliminary study, CAN J VET R, 64(4), 2000, pp. 249-253
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE VETERINAIRE
The objective of this paper was to evaluate the use of romifidine as a prem
edicant in dogs before general anesthesia induced with propofol or thiopent
one and maintained with halothane-N2O. Fifteen healthy dogs were anesthetiz
ed twice. Each dog received, as preanesthetic protocol, atropine (10 mu g/k
g, IM) and romifidine (40 mu g/kg, IM); induction was delivered with propof
ol or thiopentone and anesthesia was maintained with halothane and N2O for
1 h. Some cardiovascular and respiratory variables and recovery rimes were
recorded. Induction doses of propofol or thiopentone and the percentage of
halothane necessary for maintaining anesthesia were also registered. Thiope
ntone as an induction agent is more respiratory depressive but is less hypo
tensive than propofol. Thiopentone reduces further the percentage of haloth
ane necessary for maintaining the anesthesia. However, the quality of recov
ery is poorer, as the time to extubation is longer and the dogs occasionall
y had a violent recovery. The combination of romifidine, atropine, propofol
, halothane, and N2O appears to be an effective combination for inducing an
d maintaining general anesthesia in healthy dogs.