Purpose: The study was designed to assess one surgeon's operative mortality
and morbidity for carotid endarterectomy using local anaesthetic (LA) comp
ared to general anaesthetic (GA) techniques.
Method: Data were collected prospectively from 200 patients undergoing LA c
arotid surgery compared with 243 patients undergoing carotid surgery using
GA technique. Indication for surgical, pathology, postoperative morbidity a
nd mortality was assessed.
Results: No major strokes or deaths occurred in the LA group (0/200), Signi
ficantly more major strokes and/or deaths occurred in the GA group (11/243,
4.5%; P = 0.016), Significant less shunt usage was associated with LA (LA
18/200, 9% versus 94/243, 39%; P = 0.001), The absense of a shunt was assoc
iated with more major events in the GA group (5/143, P = 0.001, Age greater
than 74 yr was associated with greater major events (4/31, P = 0.002). No
significant difference in the frequency of cardiovascular complications was
observed (LA, 15/200 (7.5%) vs GA, 19/243(7.8%); P = 0.924).
Conclusion: Local anaesthesia enables the surgeon to assess the level of ce
rebral perfusion with an awake patient, gives greater assurances of cerebra
l protection during arterial clamping and a provides for a more relaxed and
cautious endarterectomy and repair, This study demonstrates reduction in m
ortality and major stroke events in patients operated on with these conditi
ons, (C) 2000 The International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. Publish
ed by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.