This study investigates the relationship between audit pricing and lit
igation risk. The main question posed in the research is: Are audit fe
es adequate to compensate auditors for litigation risk? The answer to
this question is an essential element in assessing the severity and im
plications of the liability crisis in auditing. The paper approaches t
he question in several stages. First, there is an economic analysis of
audit pricing. Second, there is a review and reinterpretation of the
empirical literature related to audit pricing. Lastly, new evidence is
provided from a sample of 249 audits done by a Big 6 auditor. The mai
n results from these analyses are: increased litigation is likely to r
esult in a demand displacement from high-quality to low-quality audito
rs; the archival evidence suggests that audit fees do reflect variatio
ns in litigation risk and that there is some evidence of the predicted
demand displacement; and the evidence from the audits included in the
sample suggests the incremental contribution margin from the change i
n audit fees attributable to litigation risk factors appeared to be ad
equate to cover the costs of litigation for the audit firm performing
the audits during the period studied.