Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging inthe estimation of left ventricular filling pressures - A comparative simultaneous Doppler-Catheterization study
Sr. Ommen et al., Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging inthe estimation of left ventricular filling pressures - A comparative simultaneous Doppler-Catheterization study, CIRCULATION, 102(15), 2000, pp. 1788-1794
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background-Noninvasive assessment of diastolic filling by Doppler echocardi
ography provides important information about left ventricular (LV) status i
n selected subsets of patients. This study was designed to assess whether m
itral annular velocities as assessed by tissue Doppler imaging are associat
ed with invasive measures of diastolic LV performance and whether additiona
l information is gained over traditional Doppler variables.
Methods and Results-One hundred consecutive patients referred for cardiac c
atheterization underwent simultaneous Doppler interrogation. Invasive measu
rements of LV pressures were obtained with micromanometer-tipped catheters,
and the mean LV diastolic pressure (M-LVDP) was used as a surrogate for me
an left atrial pressure. Doppler signals from the mitral inflow, pulmonary
venous inflow, and TDI of the mitral annulus were obtained. Isolated parame
ters of transmitral flow correlated with M-LVDP only when ejection fraction
<50%. The ratio of mitral velocity to early diastolic velocity of the mitr
al annulus (E/E') showed a better correlation with M-LVDP than did other Do
ppler variables for all levels of systolic function. E/E' <8 accurately pre
dicted normal M-LVDP, and E/E' >15 identified increased M-LVDP. Wide variab
ility was present in those with E/E' of 8 to 15. A subset of those patients
with E/E' 8 to 15 could be further defined by use of other Doppler data.
Conclusions-The combination of tissue Doppler imaging of the mitral annulus
and mitral inflow velocity curves provides better estimates of LV filling
pressures than other methods (pulmonary vein, preload reduction), However,
accurate prediction of filling pressures for an individual patient requires
a stepwise approach incorporating all available data.