Ad. Hay et al., Euclidean distance matrix analysis of surgical changes in prepubertal craniofacial microsomia patients treated with an inverted L osteotomy, CLEF PAL-CR, 37(5), 2000, pp. 497-502
Objectives: Correction of craniofacial microsomia (CFM) presents several ch
allenges concerning the modality of surgical intervention. The aim of this
study was to assess early and late surgical outcome, by undertaking Euclide
an distance matrix analysis (EDMA) of CFM patients exhibiting an unilateral
mandibular deformity that was surgically corrected by an inverted L osteot
omy and autogenous bone graft.
Design: Longitudinal study. Preoperative, approximate to 1-year postoperati
ve and approximate to 3-year postoperative assessments of 14 consecutive ch
ildren (mean age 9 years) with CFM. Posteroanterior cephalographs were scan
ned and five homologous mandibular landmarks were digitized in triplicate (
< 1% digitization error). Average mandibular geometries, scaled to an equiv
alent size, were generated using a generalized rotational fit program (Proc
rustes superimposition) and subjected to EDMA,
Results: The mean pre- and both postoperative mandibular configurations dif
fered statistically (p < .01). Early postoperative improvements in mandibul
ar form were noted; increases in length arising in the treated mandibular b
ody (approximate to 19%) and ramus (approximate to 13%). Comparing early an
d late postoperative configurations, a decrease of approximate to 22% in th
e late postoperative mandibular body length was evident, but the ramus main
tained steady vertical growth (approximate to 7%). Comparing the preoperati
ve and late postoperative configurations, the decrease observed in the mand
ibular body on the treated side was reduced to approximate to 8% while the
ramus maintained good growth (approximate to 20%) on that side.
Conclusion: Mandibular morphology is improved significantly in CFM patients
surgically treated by an inverted L osteotomy, but relapse in the mandibul
ar body is evident after approximate to 3 years. Nevertheless, ramus growth
proceeds well after the surgical reconstruction.