Measurement of cardiac natriuretic hormones (atrial natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide, and related peptides) in clinical practice: The need for a new generation of immunoassay methods
A. Clerico et al., Measurement of cardiac natriuretic hormones (atrial natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide, and related peptides) in clinical practice: The need for a new generation of immunoassay methods, CLIN CHEM, 46(10), 2000, pp. 1529-1534
Background: Cardiac natriuretic hormones (CNHs) are a family of related pep
tides, including atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptid
e (BNP), and other peptides derived from the N-terminal portion of the proA
NP and proBNP peptide chains. Assays for cardiac natriuretic peptides have
been proposed to help assess clinical conditions associated with expanded f
luid volume. In particular, the assays can be useful for distinguishing hea
lthy subjects from patients in different stages of heart failure. Measureme
nts of these hormones have also been considered for prognostic indicators o
f long-term survival in patients with heart failure and/or after acute myoc
ardial infarction. The different CNHs differ in their production/secretion
patterns and have different clearance rates. Furthermore, there are numerou
s proposed assay configurations for each of these hormones, and it is not c
lear which assay provides the best pathophysiological and/or clinical infor
mation.
Approach: Here we review recent studies concerning the competitive (such as
RIA, enzyme immunoassay, or luminescence immunoassay) and noncompetitive i
mmunoassays (such as two-site IRMA, ELISA, or immunoluminometric assay) for
the different cardiac natriuretic peptides to compare the analytical chara
cteristics and clinical relevance of assays for the different CNHs and the
different assay formats.
Content: Developing sensitive, precise, and accurate immunoassays for cardi
ac natriuretic peptides has been difficult because of their low concentrati
ons ton average, similar to 3-6 pmol/L) in healthy subjects and because of
their structural, metabolic, and physiological characteristics. Competitive
assays have historically suffered from lack of sensitivity and specificity
for the biologically active peptides. These usually require tedious extrac
tion procedures prior to analysis. Recently, immunometric assays have been
developed that have improved sensitivity and specificity; it appears these
will be the methods of choice.
Summary: To date, there is no consensus on the best assay procedure of card
iac natriuretic peptides. To facilitate widespread propagation of determina
tion of these hormones in routine clinical practice, it will be necessary t
o study the new generation of noncompetitive immunometric methods that are
less time-consuming and more sensitive and specific. Although several studi
es suggest that BNP exhibits better clinical utility than the other CNHs,mo
re studies examining multiple CNHs in the; same cohorts of patients will be
necessary. (C) 2000 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.