Pedigrees are a foundation of genetic counseling and human genetic research
. To protect patient/subject and family privacy and confidentiality it is n
ot unusual to find published pedigrees that have been masked (i.e. a pedigr
ee that has been changed in ways that are obvious to the reader such as dia
monds to mask gender) or altered (i.e. changing pedigree information in way
s that are not obvious to the reader such as changing gender and birth orde
r or deleting unaffected siblings from the pedigree). failure to report ped
igree data (e.g. omitting ages, ethnicity, etc.) is another measure used to
protect subject and family confidentiality. At what point do such practice
s hinder the recognition of genetic processes? Is there evidence that harm
has occurred to subjects who have appeared in published pedigrees? How does
the researcher or clinician determine which information is essential to re
cord on the pedigree? The author uses a historical perspective and case exa
mples to illustrate the issues of balancing protection of the genetic subje
ct's privacy with the reporting of unaltered family data. The author presen
ts several critical questions for peer reviewers and investigators to consi
der when a pedigree is included in a manuscript, or for researchers involve
d in family studies.