The role of percutaneous biopsy in detection of pancreatic transplant rejection

Citation
Bc. Lee et al., The role of percutaneous biopsy in detection of pancreatic transplant rejection, CLIN TRANSP, 14(5), 2000, pp. 493-498
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
09020063 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
493 - 498
Database
ISI
SICI code
0902-0063(200010)14:5<493:TROPBI>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety o f percutaneous pancreatic transplant biopsy guided by ultrasound alone or w ith a combination of computerized tomography (CT) for pancreas localization and ultrasound for needle placement. We also compare our finding on the us e of 18-gauge and 20-gauge needles for percutaneous pancreatic transplant b iopsy. In 42 attempted biopsies performed on 21 patients, two different imaging mo dalities were used. Twenty-seven attempted biopsies were performed under th e guidance of ultrasound alone, and 15 used a combination of ultrasound and CT. Of the 27 ultrasound-guided biopsies, 24 produced at least one sample adequate for histopathological analysis for an 89% biopsy success rate. Of the 15 biopsies guided by combined ultrasound and CT, 11 produced adequate samples for a 73% success rate. For all biopsies, an 83% success rate was f ound. In assessing the use of 18-gauge versus 20-gauge needles, 86 out of 1 10 tissue cores were adequate for histopathological analysis for a 78% yiel d. In 27 biopsy attempts using the 18-gauge needle, 75 tissue cores were ob tained, for an average of 2.8 cores per biopsy. Fifty-seven pancreas sample s collected using the 18-gauge needle were adequate for pathological evalua tion for a 76% yield. With 15 biopsy attempts using the 20-gauge needle, 35 tissue cores were collected, for an average of 2.3 cores per biopsy. Twent y-nine pancreas specimens obtained from using the 20-gauge needle were adeq uate for analysis far an 83% yield. No major complications occurred. Only o ne incidence of minor complication was reported for a 2% complication rate. The only complication was local, mild bleeding at the biopsy site in one c ase. Air within the transplant pancreas as revealed by post-biopsy scans an d streaky density appearing adjacent to the biopsy site occurred in a total of four cases and were not included. No complications were reported that r equired any invasive intervention. We conclude that percutaneous biopsy guided by ultrasound is a safe, simple , and effective method to detect pancreatic transplant rejection. Our resul ts for biopsies compare favorably with other reported techniques in terms o f effectiveness, complication rates, and ease of use. With its high success rate and low complications, ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy is an ex cellent method to sample pancreatic transplant.