Good management models and good models for understanding biology differ in
basic philosophy. Management models must facilitate management decisions de
spite large amounts of uncertainty about the managed populations. Such mode
ls must be based on parameters that can be estimated readily must explicitl
y account for uncertainty, and should be simple to understand and implement
In contrast biological models are designed to elucidate the workings of bi
ology,and should not be constrained by management concerns. We illustrate t
he need to incorporate uncertainty in management models by reviewing the in
adequacy of using standard biological models to manage marine mammals in th
e United States. Past management was based on a simple model that, although
it may have represented population dynamics adequately,failed as a managem
ent tool because the parameter that triggered management action was extreme
ly difficult to estimate for the majority of populations. Uncertainty in pa
rameter estimation resulted in few conservation actions We describe a recen
tly adopted management scheme that incorporates uncertainty and its resulti
ng implementation. The approach used in this simple management scheme, whic
h was tested by using simulation models, incorporates uncertainty and manda
tes monitoring abundance and human-caused mortality. Although the entire sc
heme may be suitable for application to some terrestrial and marine problem
s, two features are broadly applicable: the incorporation of uncertainty th
rough simulations of management and the use of quantitative management crit
eria to translate verbal objectives into levels of acceptable risk.