Fishing-gear restrictions and conservation of benthic habitat complexity

When two commercially important marine species coexist in the same habitat, conflict may arise between different sectors of the fishing industry. A go od example of this situation is when fishers using towed bottom-fishing gea r (scallop dredges, beam trawls, and otter trawls) operate in the same area s in which fixed-bottom gear (crab pots) are deployed. We examined an area subject to a voluntary agreement between these two sectors of the fishing i ndustry such that some areas are used exclusively by fixed-gear fishers, so me are shared seasonally by both sectors, and others are open to all method s of fishing all year. This agreement was enacted to resolve conflict betwe en the two sectors of the industry. An additional possible benefit of this agreement is the protection of the seabed from towed bottom-fishing gear, w hich is one of the greatest sources of anthropogenic disturbance of seabed habitats worldwide. Previous studies have demonstrated that complex emergen t epifaunal communities are substantially altered by such activities This h abitat alteration in turn influences closely associated species, some of wh ich may be of commercial importance. We undertook comparative surveys of th e benthic habitat and communities within the area covered by the agreement and compared different areas subjected to a range of fishing disturbance re gimes. Communities found within the areas closed to towed fishing gears wer e significantly different from those open to fishing either permanently or seasonally. Abundance-biomass curves demonstrated that the communities with in the dosed areas were dominated by higher biomass and emergent fauna that increased habitat complexity. Areas fished by towed gear were dominated by smaller-bodied fauna and scavenging taxa. Scallop dredges and beam trawls used on more stable habitats appear to have greater impacts on the environm ent than lighter otter trawls used in shallower water with less stable sedi ments. It would appear from our data that conflict management in the form o f gear-restriction measures has the added benefit of conserving habitats an d benthic fauna sensitive to bottom-fishing disturbance.