Ms. Osato, Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori: Sensitivity test results and their clinical relevance, CUR PHARM D, 6(15), 2000, pp. 1545-1555
There are multiple test methodologies to determine the antibiogram of an or
ganism. Standardized susceptibility test methods are based upon rapidly gro
wing, aerobic microorganisms in which overnight incubation results in defin
itive endpoints. In vitro susceptibility testing for fastidious organisms t
hat require complex media for growth, require incubation in atmospheres oth
er than ambient air, or are slow-growing (anaerobes, mycobacteria, filament
ous fungi) are problematic and in general are not standardized. H. pylori f
alls into this category of troublesome organisms. For the microaerobic orga
nism H. pylori, testing is challenging because the organism grows slowly ev
en under optimal culture conditions. Recently the National Committee for Cl
inical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) approved the agar dilution method as th
e test of choice for testing H. pylori. While not entirely reliable in pred
icting the outcome of treatment for metronidazole resistant organisms, the
resistance determined for clarithromycin by this method generally predicts
treatment failure. Quality control breakpoints for H. pylori ATCC 43504 wer
e established and breakpoints for clarithromycin were approved by the NCCLS
in 1999. Breakpoints are minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of a drug
at which an organism is deemed either susceptible or resistant to the anti
biotic using standard dosing regimens containing that drug. Significant pro
gress has been made with respect to development of tests to detect antimicr
obial resistance, but there still. remains no consensus as to the breakpoin
ts for agents used in the treatment of H. pylori infection other than clari
thromycin. This article will address the controversies associated with the
reporting of antibiotic resistance data and the interpretation of these dat
a.