Wh. Sheng et al., Evaluation of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for prevention of catheter-related infection in intensive care unit patients, DIAG MICR I, 38(1), 2000, pp. 1-5
Central venous catheterization represents a significant medical advancement
, particularly in the treatment of critical ill. However, there is a high r
isk of central venous catheters-related infection. A novel antiseptic centr
al venous catheter, made of polyurethane and impregnated with chlorhexidine
and silver sulfadiazine, was developed to reduce the risk of catheters-rel
ated infection. In this study, we did a randomized clinical study to determ
ine the efficacy by using antiseptic catheters for the prevention of centra
l venous catheters related infection in the intensive care units. A total o
f 204 patients with 235 central venous catheters were studied at the surgic
al intensive care units at National Taiwan University Hospital between Nove
mber 1998 and June 1999. Participants received either a standard triple-lum
en polyurethane catheter or an antiseptic catheter (Arrow International, Re
ading, Pennsylvania, USA). Both were indistinguishable from each other. Com
pared to standard polyurethane catheters, antiseptic catheters were less li
kely to be colonized by microorganisms when they were cultured at the remov
al (8.0 versus 20.0 colonized catheters per 100 catheters; relative risk 0.
34 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.74]; p < 0.01). There was no significant differences
between both groups in catheter-related infections (0.9 versus 4.9 infectio
ns per 100 catheters; relative risk 0.17 [95% CI, 0.03 to 1.15]; p = 0.07).
Gram-positive cocci and fungi were more likely to colonize in the standard
polyurethane catheters (p = 0.06 and 0.04, compared to antiseptic catheter
s respectively). Two of our cases in the control group died directly due to
catheter-related candidemia. No adverse reactions such as hypersensitivity
or leukopenia were found in the antiseptic catheter group. Our study showe
d that central venous catheters with antiseptic coating were safe and had l
ess risk of colonization of bacteria and fungi than standard catheters in t
he critically ill patients. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reser
ved.