Role of three-dimensional ultrasonographic measurement of endometrium volume as a predictor of pregnancy outcome in an IVF-ET program: a preliminary study

Citation
C. Yaman et al., Role of three-dimensional ultrasonographic measurement of endometrium volume as a predictor of pregnancy outcome in an IVF-ET program: a preliminary study, FERT STERIL, 74(4), 2000, pp. 797-801
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
FERTILITY AND STERILITY
ISSN journal
00150282 → ACNP
Volume
74
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
797 - 801
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(200010)74:4<797:ROTUMO>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the role of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonographic measurement of the endometrium in predicting pregnancy in an IVF-ET program . Design: Prospective study. Setting: Center for assisted reproductive techniques. Patient(s): 65 women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF . Intervention(s): Ultrasonographic examination on the day of hCG administrat ion. Main Outcome Measure(s): Endometrial volume, endometrial thickness, and pre gnancy rate. Result(s): The mean (+/- SD) endometrium volume (4.16 +/- 1.97 mL), endomet rium thickness (11 +/- 2 mm), and estradiol level (1686.82 +/- 1057.10 pg/m L) in 21 pregnant women on the day of hCG administration did not differ sta tistically differ from the respective values in 44 nonpregnant women (4.53 +/- 1.79 mL; 11 +/- 2 mm, 1883.56 +/- 1147.21 pg/mL). Receiver-operating ch aracteristic curves showed that the area under curve (AUC) was 0.57 for end ometrial volume and 0.48 for endometrial thickness. Using a cut-off value o f 2.5 mL for endometrial volume to predict pregnancy, results of the Fisher exact test were statistically significant. No significant cut-off value wa s found for endometrial thickness. Conclusion(s): Endometrial volume and thickness on the day of hCG administr ation did not predict occurrence of pregnancy. A minimum volume of 2.5 mL a ppeared to favor pregnancy. The predictive value of 3D ultrasonographic mea surement of endometrial volume and thickness was better than that of 2D mea surement. (Fertil Steril (R) 2000;74:797-801. (C) 2000 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.).