S. Ginsberg et al., A prospective comparison of three heat preservation methods for patients undergoing hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, J CARDIOTHO, 14(5), 2000, pp. 501-505
Objective: To prospectively compare 3 methods of body heat preservation in
patients undergoing surgery requiring the use of hypothermic cardiopulmonar
y bypass (CPB).
Design: Prospective, randomized, and nonblinded.
Setting: University teaching hospital.
Participants: Adult cardiac surgery patients(n = 101).
Interventions: Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups:
Group 1 (n = 33) used a fluid-filled warming blanket, group 2 (n = 31) used
a heated and humidified breathing circuit, and group 3 (n = 37) used intra
venous fluid warmers for the administration of all fluids. Treatments start
ed on separation from CPB and concluded at the end of the intraoperative ex
perience. Anesthetic technique, minute ventilation, conduct of CPB, and roo
m temperature in the operating room were standardized.
Measurements and Main Results: Blood temperature was measured at its nadir
on CPB, on separation from CPB, and just before departure from the operatin
g room. No differences were found among groups for CPB duration, coldest ve
nous temperature on CPB, rewarming time, rate of rewarming, room temperatur
e, or blood temperature on separation from CPB. There were no significant d
ifferences found in post-CPB temperature afterdrop among groups.
Conclusions: This study suggests that there is no statistically significant
disparity in the effectiveness of these 3 intraoperative heat preservation
methods. Ease of use and cost-effectiveness should guide the choice of war
ming method post-CPB.
Copyright (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company.