Excitation evoked by FMRFamide and FLRFamide in the heart of Buccinum undatum and evidence for inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate as an RF-tetrapeptide second messenger
Am. Ellis et H. Huddart, Excitation evoked by FMRFamide and FLRFamide in the heart of Buccinum undatum and evidence for inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate as an RF-tetrapeptide second messenger, J COMP PH B, 170(5-6), 2000, pp. 351-356
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences",Physiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY B-BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMIC AND ENVIRONMENTALPHYSIOLOGY
In this study the relative potencies of four established molluscan cardioex
citatory agents were examined on Buccinum heart. The potencies were, in dec
ending order: phenylalanine-leucine-arginine-phenylalanine-NH2 (FLRFamide)
> phenylalanine-methionine-arginine-phenylalanine-NH2 (FMRFamide; 80% of ma
ximum) > 5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT; 60% of maximum) > guanosine triphosphate
(GTP; 15% of maximum). FMRFamide and FLRFamide had similar dose-response c
urve patterns with thresholds at 10(-9) mol l(-1) but FLRFamide was more po
tent than FMRFamide. The superfused atrium was much less sensitive to all a
gonists than the internally perfused ventricle. FLRFamide and FMRFamide ind
uced small depolarizations (1-2 mV) which triggered a burst of action poten
tials of about 5 mV which on reaching 4 mV triggered a burst of fast twitch
contractions. Lithium, at high concentrations inhibited FMRFamide and 5-HT
responses of internally perfused ventricles. Neomycin also inhibited pepti
de responses, but was without effect on 5-HT responses. Heparin, however, f
or technical reasons was without effect on ventricular responses to all thr
ee agonists. FMRFamide and FLRFamide appear to share a common receptor, the
potency difference being due to the substitution of leucine for methionine
in FLRFamide. The RF N-terminal sequence appears crucial for receptor acti
vation. The Phospholipase C inhibitor neomycin equally inhibits responses t
o the two peptides while 5-HT responses are unaffected. This implicates a p
eptide/receptor interaction which activated inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (I
P3) as a second messenger.