Ch. Yeung et al., Maturational changes of the CD52-like epididymal glycoprotein on cynomolgus monkey sperm and their apparent reversal in capacitation conditions, MOL REPROD, 57(3), 2000, pp. 280-289
A major epididymal secretory protein in men has a colinear cDNA sequence wi
th lymphocyte CD52, a sialylated glycoprotein. Immunostaining and flow cyto
metric detection of cynomolgus monkey sperm CD52 during epididymal maturati
on showed increases from 20 to 85% stained sperm from the caput to the corp
us with staining intensities doubled. Freshly prepared cauda sperm showed o
nly 10% staining while they markedly increased in percentage and intensity
of staining upon incubation at 37 degrees C under capacitating conditions,
but not at 4 degrees C. Western blotting of proteins from fresh cauda sperm
revealed no less antigen than corpus sperm. Staining of ejaculated sperm e
xhibited similar increases during incubation. Further washing with a high s
alt medium before staining to remove any electrostatically-bound molecules
masking the antigen showed no effect. Incubation-induced increases in antig
en binding were accelerated by the addition of neuraminidase (0.25 and 0.5
U/ml), but not affected by the sialyl residue-rich fetuin (5 mg/ml) competi
ng for any endogenous neuraminidase. There were no concomitant decreases in
the staining of sialic acid residues during capacitation-incubation. These
findings suggest a cryptic antigen epitope site as a consequence of sperm
maturation and subsequent re-exposure under capacitation conditions, but no
t due to the removal of sialic acid residues by endogenous neuraminidase. I
nvolvement of endogenous proteases was also ruled out, as incubation in the
presence of protease inhibitors did not hinder the increases but resulted
in a dose-dependent enhancement in staining, suggesting some protease-sensi
tive unmasking process. In conclusion, the monkey epididymal secreted CD52
on sperm underwent changes in antigenic characteristics during sperm matura
tion which were reversed under capacitation conditions. Mel. Reprod. Dev. 5
7:280-289, 2000. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.