Heparins and blood polymorphonuclear stimulation in haemodialysis: an expansion of the biocompatibility concept

Citation
P. Leitienne et al., Heparins and blood polymorphonuclear stimulation in haemodialysis: an expansion of the biocompatibility concept, NEPH DIAL T, 15(10), 2000, pp. 1631-1637
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
09310509 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
10
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1631 - 1637
Database
ISI
SICI code
0931-0509(200010)15:10<1631:HABPSI>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Background. At the concentrations used in haemodialysis and in a dose-depen dent way, unfractionated heparin (UFH) and, to a lesser degree, a low-molec ular-weight heparin (LMWH) stimulate polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) in vitro , and could act in synergy with the stimulatory effect of dialysis membrane s in vivo. To examine this hypothesis, we studied the effects of different heparin types and regimens on blood PMNs during haemodialysis sessions. Methods. Ten haemodialysed patients were studied during regular dialysis se ssions on a cellulose triacetate membrane (CT 110 G; 1.10 m(2); Baxter), wi th four different random heparin protocols: one high-UFH regimen (HHR) at 9 0 IU/kg body-weight (b.w.) and one low-UFH regimen (LHR) at 50 IU/kg b.w., and with a LMWH (nadroparin calcium) at 85 (HHR) or 45 (LHR) IU/kg b.w. Blo od granulocytes, platelet counts, and plasma granulocyte degranulation prod ucts (elastase, lactoferrin) were measured serially during 4 h dialysis ses sions. Results. After 10 min, the reduction in PMNs with UFH: was 29.5% for HHR (P < 0.01) and 28.5% for LHR (P < 0.01), and only 16.8 and 18.6% with LMWH (N S), significantly higher for HHR with UFH than with LMWH (P < 0.01). At 60 min, the elastase increase with HHR was greater, 61% with UFH (P < 0.01) an d 37.8% with LMWH (P < 0.01), significantly higher than LHR for UFH (P < 0. 05) or LMWH (P < 0.05). The overall decrease in platelets (with LMWH P < 0. 01) and the overall increase in lactoferrin (P < 0.001) were not different between heparinization procedures. Conclusion. Under a conventional heparin regimen, the PMN variation during the course of the dialysis session suggests a more biocompatible effect of LMWH over UFH. In addition, the variation of elastase favours the lower dos e, whatever the type of heparin. Heparin type and dose should therefore be considered in studies addressing biocompatibility in haemodialysis: a low d ose of LMWH may be viewed as a better biocompatible treatment with regard t o leukocyte stimulation.