A central problem in science is deciding among competing explanations of da
ta containing random errors. We argue that assessing the "complexity" of ex
planations is essential to a theoretically well-founded model selection pro
cedure. We formulate model complexity in terms of the geometry of the space
of probability distributions, Geometric complexity provides a clear intuit
ive understanding of several extant notions of model complexity. This appro
ach allows us to reconceptualize the model selection problem as one of coun
ting explanations that lie close to the "truth." We demonstrate the usefuln
ess of the approach by applying it to the recovery of models in psychophysi
cs.