Thermodynamic analysis of interactions between denaturants and protein surface exposed on unfolding: Interpretation of urea and guanidinium chloride m-values and their correlation with changes in accessible surface area (ASA) using preferential interaction coefficients and the local-bulk domain model
Es. Courtenay et al., Thermodynamic analysis of interactions between denaturants and protein surface exposed on unfolding: Interpretation of urea and guanidinium chloride m-values and their correlation with changes in accessible surface area (ASA) using preferential interaction coefficients and the local-bulk domain model, PROTEINS, 2000, pp. 72-85
A denaturant m-value is the magnitude of the slope of a typically linear pl
ot of the unfolding free energy change dG(obs)degrees vs. molar concentrati
on (C-3) of denaturant, For a given protein, the guanidinium chloride (GuHC
l) m-value is approximately twice as large as the urea m-value. Myers et al
. (Protein Sci 1995;4:2138-2148) found that experimental m-values for prote
in unfolding in both urea and GuHCl are proportional to Delta ASA(corr)(max
), the calculated maximum amount of protein surface exposed to water in unf
olding, corrected empirically for the effects of disulfide crosslinks: (ure
a m-value/Delta ASA(corr)(max)) = 0.14+/-0.01 cal M-1 Angstrom(-2) and (GuH
Cl m-value/Delta ASA(corr)(max)) = 0.28+/-0.03 cal M-1 Angstrom(-2).
The observed linearity of plots of Delta G(obs)degrees vs, C-3 indicates th
at the difference in preferential interaction coefficients Delta Gamma(3) c
haracterizing the interactions of these solutes with denatured and native p
rotein surface is approximately proportional to denaturant concentration. T
he proportionality of m-values to Delta ASA(corr)(max) indicates that the c
orresponding Delta Gamma(3) are proportional to Delta ASA(corr)(max) at any
specified solute concentration. sere we use the local-bulk domain model of
solute partitioning in the protein solution (Courtenay et al., Biochemistr
y 2000;39:4455-4471) to obtain a novel quantitative interpretation of denat
urant m-values, We deduce that the proportionality of m-value to Delta ASA(
corr)(max) results from the proportionality of B-1(0) (the amount of water
in the local domain surrounding the protein surface exposed upon unfolding)
to Delta ASA(corr)(max). We show that both the approximate proportionality
of Delta Gamma(3), to denaturant concentration and the residual dependence
of Delta Gamma(3)/m(3) (where m(3) is molal concentration) on denaturant c
oncentration are quantitatively predicted by the local-bulk domain model if
the molal-scale solute partition coefficient K-P and water-solute exchange
stoichiometry S-1,S-3 are independent of solute concentration. We obtain K
-P,K-urea = 1.12+/-0.01 and K-P,K-GuHcl = 1.16+/-0.02 (or R-P,R-GuH+ congru
ent to 1.48), values which will be useful to characterize the effect of acc
umulation of those solutes on all processes in which the water-accessible a
rea of unfolded protein surface changes. We demonstrate that the local-bulk
domain analysis of an m-value plot justifies the use of linear extrapolati
on to estimate (less than or similar to 5% error) the stability of the nati
ve protein in the absence of denaturant (Delta G(o)(o)), with respect to a
particular unfolded state.
Our surface area calculations indicate that published m-values/Delta ASA ra
tios for unfolding of alanine-based alpha-helical oligopeptides by urea and
GuHCl exceed the corresponding m-value/Delta ASA ratios for protein unfold
ing by approximately fourfold, We propose that this difference originates f
rom the approximately fourfold difference (48% vs. 13%) in the contribution
of polar backbone residues to Delta ASA of unfolding, a novel finding whic
h supports the long-standing but not universally accepted hypothesis that u
rea and guanidinium cations interact primarily with backbone amide groups.
We propose that proteins which exhibit significant deviations from the aver
age m-value/Delta ASA ratio will be found to exhibit significant deviations
from the expected amount and/or average composition of the surface exposed
on unfolding, (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.